Commission on Judicial Performance Report: CALIFORNIA STATE AUDITOR

<br><center>Commission on Judicial Performance Report</center>

COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE REPORT: News, analysis and opinion about judicial oversight and the California Commission on Judicial Performance for reporters, editors, authors, producers, content creators and the public.

Pages

Home
Contact Us
Commission on Judicial Performance Complaint Form

Showing posts with label CALIFORNIA STATE AUDITOR. Show all posts

Friday, December 30, 2016

California Judicial Branch and CJP Dogged by Controversy in 2016 - Year End News Wrap: CJP and State Auditor Initiate Court Battle, More...

State Bar of California - California State Bar - California Commission on Judicial Performance Victoria Henley Director – California Judicial Council - Federal Criminal Law - United States Code - United States Department of Justice - US Attorney Northern District of California - US Attorney Central District of California - US Attorney Eastern District of California - US Attorney Southern District of California - US Department of Justice Civil Rights Division - The United States Department of Justice - Attorney General of the United States - U.S. Department of Justice – Civil Rights Division – Civil Division - Criminal Division - Office for Access to Justice – Antitrust Division – Office of the Inspector General – Office of Professional Responsibility – Office of Privacy and Civil Liberties – Office for Victims of Crimes – Civil RICO

Supreme Court Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye obstructs
State Bar reform.

Tuesday, November 22, 2016

State Auditor Files Response to CJP Lawsuit Trying to Block Legislature Ordered Audit of Judge Oversight Agency

"I don't know what they are afraid of." Attorney Myron Moskovitz

From the Daily Journal:

CJP Chief Counsel Victoria B. Henley Judicial Performance Commission California - U.S. Department of Justice – Civil Rights Division – Civil Division - Criminal Division - Office for Access to Justice – Antitrust Division – Office of the Inspector General – Office of Professional Responsibility – Office of Privacy and Civil Liberties – Office for Victims of Crimes – Civil RICO – Meet the U.S. Attorney – The United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530 - California Supreme Court Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye, Justice Ming Chin, Justice Kathryn Werdegar, Justice Carol Corrigan, Justice Mariano Cuellar, Justice Leondra Kruger, Justice Goodwin Liu Supreme Court of California – US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Judge Sidney Runyan Thomas, Judge Steven Reinhardt, Judge Alex Kozinski, Judge William Fletcher, Judge Richard Paez, Judge Marsha Berzon, Judge Consuelo Maria Callahan, Judge Carlos Bea, Judge Michelle Friedland, Judge Alfred Goodwin, Judge John Noonan 9th Circuit Court of Appeals – California Commission on Judicial Performance Victoria Henley Director – California Judicial Council

Attorneys for the California State Auditor submitted a response Monday to a writ filed last month by the Commission on Judicial Performance challenging the auditor's jurisdiction.

The CJP sued Auditor Elaine M. Howle in San Francisco Superior Court in October, seeking to limit the scope of an audit ordered by the Legislature in August. The CJP is the state agency that investigates and disciplines judges charged with misconduct...

Friday, August 12, 2016

Center for Judicial Excellence, Marin County Court Reform Advocates Applaud Commission on Judicial Performance Audit

California Supreme Court Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye - Marin County Family Court - Marin County Superior Court Judge Kelly Simmons - California Commission on Judicial Performance Chief Counsel Victoria Henley Director CJP -

Read the full article at the Marin Independent Journal.

Posted by PelicanBriefed at 9:45 PM No comments:

Email This BlogThis!Share to X Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest

Labels: CALIFORNIA STATE AUDITOR, CENTER FOR JUDICIAL EXCELLENCE, CJE, COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE, MARIN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

Location: Marin County Superior Court - Civic Center Dr, San Rafael, CA 94903, USA

Older Posts Home

A California Judicial Branch News Service site

Law Blogs We Like

Constitutional Law Prof Blog
Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog
Workplace Prof Blog
TortsProf Blog
CrimProf Blog
Nonprofit Law Prof Blog
White Collar Crime Prof Blog
Human Rights at Home Blog
Mass Tort Litigation Blog
Environmental Law Prof Blog
Law & Economics Prof Blog
Legislation Law Prof Blog
Business Law Prof Blog
Family Law Prof Blog
TaxProf Blog

About the Commission on Judicial Performance in California

The Commission on Judicial Performance, established in 1960, is the independent state agency responsible for investigating complaints of judicial misconduct and judicial incapacity and for disciplining judges, pursuant to article VI, section 18 of the California Constitution.

The commission's mandate is to protect the public, enforce rigorous standards of judicial conduct and maintain public confidence in the integrity and independence of the judicial system. While the majority of California's judges are committed to maintaining the high standards expected of the judiciary, an effective method of disciplining judges who engage in misconduct is essential to the functioning of our judicial system. Commission proceedings provide a fair and appropriate mechanism to preserve the integrity of the judicial process.

The commission's jurisdiction includes all judges of California's superior courts and the justices of the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court. The commission also has jurisdiction over former judges for conduct prior to retirement or resignation. Additionally, the commission shares authority with the superior courts for the oversight of court commissioners and referees. Victoria Henley, Director-Chief Counsel of the commission, is designated as the Supreme Court's investigator for complaints involving the judges of the State Bar Court. The commission does not have authority over federal judges, judges pro tem or private judges. In addition to its disciplinary function, the commission is responsible for handling judges' applications for disability retirement.

The commission's authority is limited to investigating allegations of judicial misconduct and, if warranted, imposing discipline. Judicial misconduct usually involves conduct in conflict with the standards set forth in the Code of Judicial Ethics. The commission cannot change a decision made by any judicial officer; this is a function of the state's appellate courts. After investigation, and in some cases a public hearing, the commission may impose sanctions ranging from confidential discipline to removal from office.

Commission on Judicial Performance Employees and Pay

Current and former Commission on Judicial Performance employees, with title and pay include:

Victoria B. Henley, Director-Chief Counsel $194,000; Janice M. Brickley, Legal Advisor to Commissioners $162,00; Bradford L. Battson, Senior Attorney III $133,000; Stephen D. Rockwell, Senior Attorney III $133,000; Sei Shimoguchi, Senior Attorney II $126,000; Mariah Baird, Senior Attorney III $123,00; Valerie L. Marchant, Senior Attorney III $117,00; Cynthia R. Dorfman, Senior Attorney IV $116,000; Sonya R. Smith, Senior Attorney II $107,000; Charlene M. Drummer, Senior Attorney III $106,000; David Lane, Senior Attorney II $94,200; Amy N. Ladine, Supervising Administrative Specialist $94,000; Karen L. Claybroome, Senior Attorney II $80,000; Malissa Thomas, Administrative Assistant to the Legal Advisor $64,800; Khoi N. Bui, Senior Information Technology Specialist $64,700; Alexis Y. Barber, Administrative Assistant to Counsel $64,600; Ronnie B. Moises, Business Services Officer II $63,300; Ester A. Jeung, Secretary to Staff Counsel II $61,700; Ashley L. Sisson, Secretary to Staff Counsel I $52,200; Mary M. Harvey, Secretary to Staff Counsel I $43,800; Anjuli L. Fiedler, Senior Attorney II $29,800; Collette A. Brooks, Senior Attorney III $20,600; Robin S. Hebert, Secretary to Staff Counsel I $3,880; Nancy Gilmore, Supervising Administrative Specialist.

Source: Sacramento Bee State Worker Salary Database.

Commission on Judicial Performance

455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 14400

San Francisco, CA 94102

Tel: (415) 557-1200

Fax: (415) 557-1266

Frequently Asked Questions About the Commission on Judicial Performance

1. What Is the Commission on Judicial Performance?: The Commission on Judicial Performance is the independent state agency responsible for investigating complaints of judicial misconduct and for disciplining judicial officers.

2. Over Whom Does the Commission Have Authority?: The commission has authority over all active California state court judges and over former judges for conduct while they were active judges. The commission also has authority over court commissioners and referees as explained in Question 10. In addition, Victoria B. Henley the Director-Chief Counsel of the commission is designated as the Supreme Court's investigator for complaints involving State Bar Court judges.

3. Who Can File a Complaint?: Any individual or group may file a complaint. The commission has received complaints from litigants, attorneys, jurors, court-watchers, court personnel, prisoners, court administrators, members of the public, judges, legislators, and others. Anyone who has knowledge of possible judicial misconduct may file a complaint. The commission also considers complaints made anonymously and matters it learns of in other ways, such as from news articles or from information received in the course of a commission investigation.

4. What Is Judicial Misconduct?: Judicial misconduct usually involves conduct in conflict with the standards set forth in the Code of Judicial Ethics. Some examples of judicial misconduct are rude or abusive demeanor, conflict of interest, abuse of the contempt power, communicating improperly with only one side to a proceeding, delay in decision-making, and commenting on a pending case. Judicial discipline has been categorized according to the Types of Misconduct involved.

5. What Can the Commission Do?: The commission investigates complaints of judicial misconduct and, when warranted, imposes discipline. The commission can issue confidential advisory letters, private admonishments, public admonishments and public censures. In the most serious cases, the commission can order that a judge be removed or retired from office, bar a former judge from receiving judicial appointments or assignments, or find that a court commissioner or referee is ineligible to serve as a subordinate judicial officer.

6. Can the Commission Change a Legal Ruling?: No. The commission does not have authority to direct a judge to take legal action or to reverse a judge's decision or ruling for judicial error, mistake or other legal grounds. These functions are for the state's appellate courts. Allegations stemming from a judge's rulings or exercise of discretion ordinarily do not provide a basis for commission action, and personal dissatisfaction with a legal ruling is not grounds for investigation of a judge.

7. Can the Commission Help Me with My Case?: No. The commission cannot provide legal assistance or advice to individuals or intervene in litigation on behalf of a party. If you need advice or assistance about what to do next concerning your case or if you seek to change the outcome of the case, you should consult a lawyer immediately.

8. How Do I File a Complaint?: Complaints must be submitted in writing. See Filing a Complaint for further information.

9. Are Complaints Treated Confidentially?: Under the California Constitution and the rules governing the commission, complaints to the commission and commission investigations are confidential. The commission ordinarily cannot confirm or deny that a complaint has been received or that an investigation is under way. If formal charges are filed, the case becomes public.

10. Can the Commission Handle Complaints About Court Commissioners or Referees?: Yes. The commission shares authority with the superior courts to investigate and discipline subordinate judicial officers - attorneys employed by California's state courts to serve as court commissioners and referees. Complaints about court commissioners or referees must first be directed to the presiding judge of the court in which the matter was heard. If you want the commission to review the local court's final action on your complaint against a court commissioner or referee, you must file a written request with the commission within 30 days after the date the notice of the local court's action on the matter was mailed.

11. Does the Commission Handle Complaints About Attorneys?: No. Complaints about attorneys should be directed to the State Bar of California.

12. Does the Commission Have Jurisdiction over Temporary Judges?: No. Judges pro tem are attorneys temporarily serving as judicial officers. The State Bar of California has jurisdiction over attorneys. Although temporary judges are not employed by the courts, you may wish to bring a complaint about a judge pro tem to the attention of the presiding judge for consideration in making future appointments.

13. Can the Commission Consider Complaints About Private Judges?: No. The commission has no authority over former judges serving as private judges. The commission's jurisdiction over former judges is limited to their conduct before retirement.

14. Does the Commission Have Jurisdiction over Retired Judges Sitting on Assignment?: No. The commission has jurisdiction over retired judges only for their conduct prior to retirement. The Assigned Judges Program of the Judicial Council has the authority to review complaints about retired judges sitting on assignment.

Copyright CJBNN - California Judicial Branch News Network. Simple theme. Powered by Blogger.